How to Compete With the Machines Making Automobiles in a Factory

A couple of years back, I was talking with a distant relative from Dayton Ohio about their robotic factory at General Motors. The workers along with the robotic factory component process were able to complete SUVs from start to finish in less than 18 hours. In other words, a bunch of parts come into the building, and within 18 hours completed automobiles painted and everything roll out the door. That’s amazing. Now then, let’s talk about what this means for the future.

Indeed one of the jokes at the local coffee shop in Dayton Ohio, and I’m sure also in Detroit is; “have you lost your job to a robot yet?” In fact, how can a human compete with a robot car assembly unit? Let’s say there is a cost of $150,000 for the robot that does a given job. A worker might also be able to do that job, or let’s say three workers because the robot works very quickly. If each worker is paid $18 an hour, plus benefits including health care and what have you there is a significant cost. Of course the robot may only last two or three years, and it costs $150,000. Therefore, it has to attain a certain return on investment, otherwise it will not pay for itself, therefore, the factory would be better off to hiring human.

Now then, we have to throw in the cost of maintenance of the robot, and qualified software specialists, and the cost of energy to run it. If you are in China, and you are willing to work for a few dollars a day or less, you would still have a job, because the factory could hire 50 people and still come out ahead on the cost of a robot. Do you see the point? Therefore, if you want to keep your job the United States, you have to work for very low wages, or you need to be the technician who works on the robots, because we all know Murphy’s Law, and we know that anything that has moving parts will break, that includes robots, and when they do, someone has to fix it.

Now eventually there will be robots fixing robots, and robots making robots, but that’s not the case right now. For the next couple of decades you can be a robotic repair person, a software technician, or become a designer of robots, and you will have a high-paying job, even better than if you worked on the factory floor, with or without robots. Indeed, that’s the only way that I can see that you will be able to compete for a job in the “Winning the Future” or WTF economy or job market of the future. Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.

Integration and Limitations on Multiple Private Placements

If you conduct multiple private placements, you run the risk that the SEC will say that what you thought were multiple, separate Private Placements was really one big Private Placement. The SEC integrates, or combines, the multiple Private Placements.

Why can multiple private placements be a problem? As described in earlier articles, each of the Rules 504, 504 and 506 have various limitations, such as the limitation on the number of Non-Accredited investors. If you cannot have more than 35 Non-Accredited investors, and in your first Private Placement you had 30 and in your second Placement you had another 30, and the SEC integrated these two Placements, you would have busted the Reg. D exemption and broken federal securities laws.

The SEC provides you with a very subjective test for integration, as follows:

* Whether the sales are part of a single plan of financing.

* Whether the sales involve issuance of the same class of securities.

* Whether the sales have been made at or about the same time.

* Whether the same type of consideration is being received.

* Whether the sales are made for the same general purpose.

Do not rely on these factors, as they almost never work. Instead, rely on the following “bright line” test in the Rule: Offers and sales that are made more than six months before the start of a Regulation D offering or are made more than six months after completion of a Regulation D offering will not be considered part of that Regulation D offering, so long as during those six month periods there are no offers or sales of securities by or for the issuer that are of the same or a similar class as those offered or sold under Regulation D, other than those offers or sales of securities under an employee benefit plan. To avoid busting the Reg. D exemption, make sure the last sale in your first Private Placement is more than six months before your first offer to sell in your second Private Placement.

There is one other aspect of the doctrine of Integration that is critical if you conduct a Private Placement followed within 6 months by a public offering, including a Selling Stockholder Registration Statement in a GoPublicDirect transaction rather than a reverse merger with a public shell. The bright line test is not available. So an integration of the Private Placement and the Public Offering will bust the exemption for the Private Placement.

However, there is another SEC Rule that provides additional protection, but only if your Private Placement was done under Rule 506. This is Rule 152 that provides: The phrase “transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering” in Section 4(2) shall be deemed to apply to transactions not involving any public offering at the time of said transactions although subsequently thereto the issuer decides to make a public offering and/or files a registration statement.

This means that even if your Placement ends within six months of the date of filing your registration statement, you will not have the two integrated, but only if the Placement was done under Rule 506. Why? As you’ll read in later articles, Rule 504 and 505, like Regulation A described above, are exemptions based not upon Section 4(2) but instead upon Section 3(b). This makes Rule 152 unavailable for Reg. D 504 and 505 Placements followed within six months by the filing of a Registration Statement.

Remember, you can Go Public Direct without a Reverse IPO reverse merger with public shell and save your company money and heartache. So if you are considering going public, get advice from an experienced SEC lawyer who knows the ins and outs of the entire process and can take a private company public directly without a Reverse IPO reverse merger with public shell.